Implicit biases are harder to change in big cities than in small cities
Peer-Reviewed Publication
Updates every hour. Last Updated: 25-Oct-2026 10:17 ET (25-Oct-2026 14:17 GMT/UTC)
Every human has implicit biases, or involuntary associations about members of different social groups. But these biases are not fixed. Rather, they’re malleable reflections of our everyday experiences.
It’s harder to change the biases of people living in big cities, with millions of people, however, than it is to change the biases of people living in small cities, with around 150,000 residents, a new study shows. This is “the first strong proof of how contextual biases are,” says Andrew Stier, a Complexity Postdoctoral Fellow at the Santa Fe Institute who performed the work.
Why do some companies pay higher rates than others, and what drives some to pay less in taxes? New research from the McCombs School of Business at The University of Texas at Austin sorts through 30 years of research on corporate tax avoidance to uncover the most significant factors. Hint: It’s not primarily manipulation or trickery.
“There’s all this noise about companies that don’t pay taxes or have very low tax rates, but if you dig in, a lot are driven by pretty benign factors,” says Andrew Belnap, assistant professor of accounting.
Publishing August 6th in the Cell Press journal iScience, scientists outline how they developed a method for generating personality assessment questionnaires with ChatGPT from any source text. To test the method, they applied it to both the DSM-5 and, as a deliberately unconventional example, an astrology textbook. Not only could ChatGPT be used to create and validate these questionnaires, but it could also accurately predict population-level responses before the surveys were administered.