Mountain ecosystems may be more resilient to climate change than previously believed, according to a new study, which reports little empirical support for the widely recognized “escalator to extinction.” The findings challenge long-standing assumptions about range shift-driven extinction and instead introduce biotic homogenization as a more immediate concern facing mountain plants and animals. Mountain ecosystems worldwide are undergoing profound change due to rapid climate change. As temperatures increase, species are expected to shift their ranges upslope to take advantage of cooler habitats. However, while mountains offer vertical refuge for species adapting to climate change, their steep and confined topography limits how far some species can move, suggesting that climate warming may disproportionately threaten mountain biodiversity, especially species restricted to high elevations, narrow ranges, or tropical lowlands. This is sometimes described as the “escalator to extinction.” While some studies support this prediction, evidence remains inconclusive, especially for range shift gaps and lowland attrition. As such, the ecological consequences of climate warming in mountain regions are likely far more intricate than a uniform upward migration.

 

Using data from 8,800 records of historical and modern elevational range limits for over 2,000 animal and plant species across five continents, and a sophisticated Bayesian modeling approach, Chen et al. found little empirical support for predicted threats. Instead, the authors found that, despite ongoing climate warming, widespread range shift-driven extinctions in mountain ecosystems have not yet materialized. According to the findings, most species' elevational range shifts remain consistent with expectations shaped by the topographical constraints of mountain landscapes. Narrow-range species are expanding upslope without the hypothesized corresponding losses at their lower limits, countering previous assumed concerns about range shift gaps. Moreover, Chen et al. show that many lowland species are moving upslope without retreating from their lower boundaries, further challenging the prevailing view that tropical lowland species are confined to narrow thermal niches. One notable ecological signal the study revealed was growing biotic homogenization, wherein species communities across different elevations have become increasingly similar. This pattern, observed in several mountain regions, is likely driven by the upslope expansion of widespread lowland species alongside the decline of specialized, range-restricted taxa. According to the authors, this homogenization may foreshadow broader biodiversity losses and could disrupt ecological interactions in ways that reverberate through entire mountain ecosystems.

Archaeologist Natalie Mueller at WashU explains how ancient agricultural systems could become a source of alternative crops and methods in an era of rapid climate change.

As climate change and development intensify flooding across the United States, disaster planners and policymakers are increasingly turning to social vulnerability indicators - such as poverty rates, racial demographics, or age - to assess which communities are most at risk. But a new study led by Princeton University researchers finds that these indicators may not be effective for every community. The connection between flood exposure and social factors varies significantly by location, which calls into question the “one-size-fits-all” approach of vulnerability measures in flood risk planning.

A first-of-its-kind study in Nature finds that with bold and coordinated policy choices—across emissions, diets, food waste, and water and nitrogen efficiency—humanity could, by 2050, bring global environmental pressures back to levels seen in 2015. This shift would move us much closer to a future in which people around the world can live well within the Earth’s limits. “Our results show that it is possible to steer back toward safer limits, but only with decisive, systemic change,” says lead author Prof Detlef Van Vuuren, a researcher at Utrecht University and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL).