image: Damage Assessment Map: Documenting the Damage Swath and Survey Sites.
Credit: Yi Yang
Existing disaster investigation systems often focus on meteorological cause analysis, while systematic research from the perspective of structural wind engineering on building damage mechanisms remains relatively limited.
In a study published in the journal Advances in Wind Engineering, researchers from South China University of Technology and collaborating institutions described the EF3-level tornado that occurred in Guangzhou, China on April 27, 2024. They achieved this by integrating methods such as UAV remote sensing, detailed ground-based post-disaster surveys, and mesoscale numerical simulation.
"This research combines meteorological simulation with structural damage analysis, systematically examining the tornado disaster from an engineering perspective," shares corresponding author Professor Yi Yang. "The findings can provide empirical data reference for refining the descriptions of engineering structural damage in China's national standard, the 'Tornado Intensity Scale'."
In the study, the research team established six main survey lines and 12 branch lines within an affected area of approximately 15 square kilometers in Guangzhou’s Baiyun District, collecting and analyzing disaster data from 471 characteristic sites. By examining nearly 500 sets of UAV images and about 1,200 sets of ground-based photos and videos, the team delineated the tornado's path: moving from west to east-southeast, with a total length of approximately 8.2 kilometers, an average width of 0.7 kilometers, and a maximum width reaching 1 kilometer. Based on the damage levels of indicators such as buildings, trees, and utility poles observed on-site, and referring to the Chinese national standard "Tornado Intensity Scale," the team rated the tornado as EF3 (with wind speeds approximately 61-73 m/s).
In the more severely affected areas (Main Survey Lines 2 and 3), numerous light-steel industrial buildings suffered severe damage to their metal roofing systems. Analysis of 431 building sites revealed that 18.33% experienced severe damage, including collapsed rigid frames and exterior walls. Common metal roof failure modes included localized tearing at self-drilling screw connections and connector pull-out from purlins.
Based on these findings, the team proposed wind-resistant design improvements such as optimizing ridge/eave geometry, increasing connector density, and using standing seam roof systems.
The study also employed the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to simulate the event. The KF-Eta scheme effectively reproduced the environmental conditions, successfully simulating parent storm characteristics like the "hook echo" signature, storm trajectory, and helicity patterns consistent with observational data. Additionally, by back-calculating the load capacity of two collapsed concrete utility poles, the research estimated peak gust wind speeds during the tornado at 74.59 m/s and 79.77 m/s.
###
Contact the author: Yi Yang, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, ctyangyi@scut.edu.cn
The publisher KeAi was established by Elsevier and China Science Publishing & Media Ltd to unfold quality research globally. In 2013, our focus shifted to open access publishing. We now proudly publish more than 200 world-class, open access, English language journals, spanning all scientific disciplines. Many of these are titles we publish in partnership with prestigious societies and academic institutions, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).
Journal
Advances in Wind Engineering
Method of Research
Survey
Subject of Research
Not applicable
Article Title
Post-disaster investigation and WRF model reconstruction of April 27th tornado in Guangzhou based on muti-source data fusion
COI Statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jian Wu is currently employed by China Nuclear Power Design Co., Ltd. The authors declare no other competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.