News Release

Reduced fertilization can enhance natural pest control without lowering crop yields

New study shows optimized nutrient use supports sustainable agriculture and strengthens biological control

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Insect Science, Chinese Academy of Science

How fertilization shapes pest dynamics and biological control in agroecosystems

image: 

Fig.1: This schematic illustrates the “bottom-up” effects of fertilization on agricultural ecosystems. Increased nutrient input enhances crop growth, which in turn supports herbivorous pests such as sap-feeding aphids. These pests are then targeted by natural enemies, including predators (e.g. ladybird beetles) and parasitoids, which provide biological control. The diagram highlights how fertilization indirectly influences pest populations and the effectiveness of biocontrol agents by altering interactions across trophic levels from plants to herbivores to natural enemies.

 

view more 

Credit: Ruohan Ma, Anne-Violette Lavoir, Nicolas Desneux

A study published in Insect Science reports that reducing fertilizer input can improve natural pest control without compromising crop yields, challenging the assumption that higher nutrient use is always beneficial in agriculture.

Led by Prof. Anne-Violette Lavoir and Nicolas Desneux, with first author Ruohan Ma, the research examined how fertilization levels affect interactions between tomato plants, aphids, and their natural enemies. In greenhouse experiments, the team compared high and moderate fertilization regimes and measured plant growth, pest populations, and biological control performance.

High fertilization increased plant biomass but also accelerated aphid population growth. In contrast, moderate fertilisation slowed pest development, while crop yield remained largely unchanged.

“Our findings show that more fertilizer does not necessarily mean better outcomes for farmers,” the researcher said. “By slightly reducing nutrient input, it is possible to maintain crop yields while enhancing natural pest control.”

Background

Modern agriculture has long relied on synthetic fertilizers, particularly nitrogen, to maximise productivity. However, excessive nutrient input can make plants more attractive to herbivorous insects, increasing pest pressure and encouraging greater pesticide use. This can negatively affect beneficial organisms and reduce ecosystem stability.

Effects on biological control

The study found that fertilization influences biological control agents differently. The parasitoid Aphidius ervi, which develops inside aphids, was sensitive to plant nutrient conditions. Although more abundant under moderate fertilization, its effectiveness declined under high fertilisation levels.

By contrast, the generalist predator Adalia bipunctata (ladybird beetle) remained effective across both fertilization regimes, indicating greater resilience to changes in plant nutrition.

“These results highlight the importance of considering ecological interactions when designing fertilization strategies,” the researchers noted. “Agriculture needs to shift from maximising inputs to optimising ecological processes.”

About the research team

This work was conducted by the Multitrophic Interaction and Biocontrol (MIB) team, which focuses on understanding the ecological and physiological interactions between insect pests, their natural enemies, and environmental conditions. The team combines approaches ranging from field and laboratory experiments to molecular biology and multiomics to develop innovative and sustainable biocontrol strategies for future agroecosystems.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that fertilization is a key factor shaping both pest dynamics and the success of biological control. Adjusting nutrient input to align with ecological processes could reduce reliance on chemical pesticides while maintaining productivity. This approach supports Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and offers a pathway towards more sustainable agriculture.

Read the full Article here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-7917.70253

 


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.