EdUHK explores classroom applications of AI new learning platforms enhance teaching and learning
The Education University of Hong Kong
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in classroom practice in Hong Kong, following the Education Bureau's release of the Blueprint for Digital Education Development in Primary and Secondary Schools and its commitment to supporting innovative technology in schools. The latest research from The Education University of Hong Kong (EdUHK) underscores that AI's educational value lies not in computational speed, but in its integration with rigorous, evidence-based and student-centred frameworks for assessment. These findings provide timely guidance for Hong Kong's digital transformation in education.
Led by Professor Zi Yan of the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, the research team analysed data from 151,969 students across 19 countries and regions in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The study examined the impact of core dimensions of formative assessment on learning outcomes. Results indicate that frequent feedback alone does not necessarily enhance learning. Instead, students' reading achievement improves when teachers clarify learning goals, monitor progress systematically, and adapt instruction in response to assessment evidence. *
Professor Yan said, "An assessment ecology is shaped jointly by school policies, teacher practices and teacher-student interactions. In an examination-oriented system, teachers may devote considerable time to feedback, yet students may not use it effectively. AI's potential depends on designs grounded in sound theory and empirical evidence. Programmes can improve learning only when they incorporate clear learning goals, ongoing assessment, and support for instructional adjustment."
He emphasised that assessment for learning must be firmly grounded in local realities, including large class sizes, teacher workload and the need for school-based support. It cannot be achieved simply by importing policies and practices from elsewhere. Building on these insights, the team has developed two platforms since 2024, supported by the Quality Education Fund and the Research Grants Council's Senior Research Fellow Scheme:
• EASE (Efficient Adaptive System for Education) – Integrates formative assessment, self-directed learning strategies and AI. Adaptive algorithms generate personalised learning pathways, while real-time feedback, automated marking, error analysis and learning reports support informed decision-making by teachers and students.
• FAITH (Formative Assessment Innovative Teaching Hub) - Provides authentic classroom examples and subject-specific materials, combining teacher-led assessment with active student participation. FAITH helps students move from passive reception to active use of feedback, while offering professional development resources and enabling schools to build a shared language and body of practice around assessment.
FAITH currently has around 350 registered users, while EASE has more than 2,200. Teachers report that the platforms enable personalised learning and more responsive instruction; students highlight increased motivation and engagement in self-directed learning. Small-scale empirical studies further suggest that EASE enhances academic performance and fosters more effective learning strategies.
The team noted that EASE integrates pedagogy, student self-assessment and motivation, moving beyond data processing to address why students struggle, what support is required, and how actively they engage. In mixed-ability classrooms, AI can organise learning data and track progress, enabling teachers to exercise professional judgement in tailoring support.
Research also highlights the challenges teachers face in curriculum pacing, the diverse needs of students, and limited strategies for formative assessment. One-off training is insufficient; sustained school-based support is essential. FAITH and EASE therefore combine research evidence, professional learning and practical tools to embed formative assessment in everyday lessons.
As digital education advances, the team argues that technology adoption must be pedagogically grounded. Student learning should remain the central purpose, and teachers' professional judgement the foundation. The research and the platforms provide an evidence base and a practical reference for schools seeking to transform teaching and assessment in an AI-enabled environment.
Beyond platform development, the team has published more than 40 articles on assessment and AI-assisted learning in leading academic journals over the past three years, including the latest paper about assessment policies, "School Assessment Policy, Teacher Assessment Practice and Training, and Reading Achievement: A Multi-Level Analysis of PISA 2018 Data," published in Education Sciences in April 2026. Additionally, a special issue guest-edited by the team, entitled Revisiting Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) in the Digital Age: Perspectives on the SRL-Achievement Link in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments, also appeared in Educational Psychology in 2026.
As Hong Kong's only publicly funded university dedicated to teacher education, EdUHK will continue to collaborate with the government, industry, families and the wider community. Drawing on its strengths in teaching and teacher education, the University is committed to building digital education infrastructure that is safe, effective, accessible and equitable, and to developing high-quality digital learning resources aligned with the local curriculum.
* The cross-national analysis controlled for family background, regional context, teacher-related factors and other confounders. A one-standard-deviation increase in a consistent, school-wide implementation of clear learning goals and progress monitoring was associated with a 0.158-standard-deviation increase in students' reading achievement. This positive association indicates that coherent, whole-school use of these assessment practices can strengthen students' reading literacy.
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.